Tribunals · London Borough of Richmond upon Thames

Atm Site At 29-34, George Street, TW9 1HY

Decided 24 May 2022 25529502

OutcomeDismissed — nobody attended for the ratepayerThe appeal failed and the rateable value was left unchanged.

Original RV—

Ratepayer sought—

VO conceded first—

Tribunal decided—

Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure.

What was argued and what the tribunal found

The appellant did not attend or provide representation or evidence to support an arguable case. Following the Supreme Court's judgment in Cardtronics v Sykes, this appeal was considered redundant after the Valuation Officer undertook list maintenance and found multiple appeals had been lodged against the same list entry. The tribunal dismissed the appeal accordingly.

Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was the ratepayer, unrepresented.

Grounds argued

Other

Evidence: None from the ratepayer
Cases cited: Cardtronics v Sykes

Is your own rateable value in line?

A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.

Check a property

The tribunal’s decision in full

Download the PDF · Find it on valuationtribunal.gov.uk