Atm Site At 30a, Streatham Place, SW2 4QY
Decided 24 May 2022 25530034
Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure.
What was argued and what the tribunal found
The appellant did not attend the hearing and was not represented, nor did they provide evidence of an arguable case. The Valuation Officer advised that this appeal had become redundant following list maintenance undertaken after the Supreme Court's judgment in Cardtronics UK Ltd v Sykes, and requested dismissal. The tribunal dismissed the appeal.
Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was the ratepayer, unrepresented.
Grounds argued
No grounds were argued — the decision records none.
- Evidence
- None from the ratepayer
- Cases cited
- Cardtronics UK Ltd and Others v Sykes
Is your own rateable value in line?
A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.
Check a propertyThe tribunal’s decision in full
Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.