Atm Site At 12b - 14, Market Street, TA9 3BP
Decided 24 May 2022 25544372 Johnson Fellows
Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure.
What was argued and what the tribunal found
This was one of several hundred ATM-related appeals that had been stayed pending the Supreme Court's judgment in Cardtronics v Sykes. Following that judgment, the Valuation Officer undertook a list maintenance exercise and considered this appeal redundant as multiple appeals had been lodged against the same list entry. The appellant did not attend, was not represented, and provided no evidence of an arguable case. The tribunal dismissed the appeal.
Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was the ratepayer, unrepresented.
Grounds argued
- Other
- Evidence
- None from the ratepayer
- Cases cited
- Cardtronics UK Ltd and Others v Sykes
Is your own rateable value in line?
A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.
Check a propertyThe tribunal’s decision in full
Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.