Tribunals · Dudley Metropolitan Borough Council

Atm At 136, Commonside, DY5 4AE

Decided 24 May 2022 25551659 Johnson Fellows - Rating

OutcomeDismissed — nobody attended for the ratepayerThe appeal failed and the rateable value was left unchanged.

Original RV—

Ratepayer sought—

VO conceded first—

Tribunal decided—

Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure.

What was argued and what the tribunal found

An ATM-related appeal that had been stayed pending the Supreme Court's decision in Cardtronics v Sykes. Following that judgment, the Valuation Officer undertook list maintenance and determined this appeal was redundant, having amended or deleted the appealed entry. The appeal was dismissed as the appellant did not appear, provide representation, or submit evidence of an arguable case.

Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was the ratepayer, unrepresented.

Grounds argued

Other

Evidence: None from the ratepayer
Cases cited: Cardtronics UK Ltd and Others v Sykes (VO) and Others

Is your own rateable value in line?

A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.

Check a property

The tribunal’s decision in full

Download the PDF · Find it on valuationtribunal.gov.uk