Tribunals · Hastings Borough Council

Atm Site At Unit 1, Station Parade Ore Valley Road, TN34 3FH

Decided 24 May 2022 25579264 Johnson Fellows

OutcomeDismissed — nobody attended for the ratepayerThe appeal failed and the rateable value was left unchanged.
Original RV—
Ratepayer sought—
VO conceded first—
Tribunal decided—

Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure.

What was argued and what the tribunal found

This was one of hundreds of ATM-related appeals that were stayed pending the Supreme Court's judgment in Cardtronics UK Ltd v Sykes. Following the judgment's release, the Valuation Officer undertook a list maintenance exercise and considered this appeal redundant following review and deletion of appealed entries. The appellant did not attend, was not represented, and provided no evidence of an arguable case, resulting in dismissal.

Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was the ratepayer, unrepresented.

Grounds argued

  • Other
Evidence
None from the ratepayer
Cases cited
Cardtronics UK Ltd and Others v Sykes

Similar decisions

All decisions in Hastings Borough Council ·

Is your own rateable value in line?

A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.

Check a property

The tribunal’s decision in full

Download the PDF · Find it on valuationtribunal.gov.uk

Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.