Atm Site At 1-3, Hancock Parade Hancock Drive, LU2 7SF

Decided 24 May 2022 25893825 Lambert Smith Hampton - London

OutcomeDismissed — nobody attended for the ratepayerThe appeal failed and the rateable value was left unchanged.

Original RV—

Ratepayer sought—

VO conceded first—

Tribunal decided—

Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure.

What was argued and what the tribunal found

This was one of several hundred Automatic Teller Machine appeals that had been stayed pending the Supreme Court's judgment in Cardtronics v Sykes. Following that judgment, the Valuation Officer undertook list maintenance and identified this appeal as redundant due to multiple appeals having been lodged against the same list entry. The Valuation Officer sought dismissal, and as the appellant did not attend, was not represented, and provided no evidence of an arguable case, the appeal was dismissed.

Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was the ratepayer, unrepresented.

Grounds argued

Other

Evidence: None from the ratepayer
Cases cited: Cardtronics UK Ltd and Others v Sykes

Is your own rateable value in line?

A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.

Check a property

The tribunal’s decision in full

Download the PDF · Find it on valuationtribunal.gov.uk