Atm At Spar Shop, Netherfield Road, BB9 0QA

Decided 24 May 2022 26589765 Johnson Fellows

OutcomeDismissed — nobody attended for the ratepayerThe appeal failed and the rateable value was left unchanged.

Original RV—

Ratepayer sought—

VO conceded first—

Tribunal decided—

Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure.

What was argued and what the tribunal found

An appeal relating to an ATM was dismissed as the Valuation Officer considered it redundant following list maintenance exercise after the Supreme Court judgment in Cardtronics v Sykes. The appellant did not attend, was not represented, and provided no evidence of an arguable case. The tribunal therefore dismissed the appeal.

Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was the ratepayer, unrepresented.

Grounds argued

Validity of the proposal · decisive

Evidence: None from the ratepayer
Cases cited: Cardtronics UK Ltd and Others v Sykes (VO) and Others [2020] UKSC 21

Is your own rateable value in line?

A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.

Check a property

The tribunal’s decision in full

Download the PDF · Find it on valuationtribunal.gov.uk