Filling Station (The), Highleadon, GL18 1HG
Decided 3 March 2023 26637764
Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure.
What was argued and what the tribunal found
The appellant failed to comply with tribunal directions regarding disclosure of statements of case and did not attend or submit representations at the hearing. The Valuation Officer contended there was no case to answer. The tribunal dismissed the appeal as the appellant provided no substantive argument disputing the rateable value for the subject hereditament.
Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was the ratepayer, unrepresented.
Grounds argued
No grounds were argued — the decision records none.
- Evidence
- None from the ratepayer
Is your own rateable value in line?
A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.
Check a propertyThe tribunal’s decision in full
Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.