Tribunals · Darlington Borough Council

Atm Site At 52-54, Cornmill, DL1 1LT

Automatic Teller Machine Decided 24 May 2022 26650335 Dunlop Heywood

OutcomeDismissed — nobody attended for the ratepayerThe appeal failed and the rateable value was left unchanged.
Original RV—
Ratepayer sought—
VO conceded first—
Tribunal decided—

Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure.

What was argued and what the tribunal found

An ATM appeal was listed as part of a large group of similar appeals stayed pending the Supreme Court's judgment in Cardtronics v Sykes. Following that judgment, the Valuation Officer undertook list maintenance and determined this appeal was redundant as a duplicate entry. The appellant did not appear or provide evidence, and the tribunal dismissed the appeal accordingly.

Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was ATM operator, unrepresented.

Grounds argued

  • Other · decisive
Evidence
None from the ratepayer
Cases cited
Cardtronics UK Ltd and Others v Sykes

Is your own rateable value in line?

A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.

Check a property

The tribunal’s decision in full

Download the PDF · Find it on valuationtribunal.gov.uk

Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.