Atm At 159, Mare Street, E8 3RH
Decided 24 May 2022 26779270 RVA Surveyors Ltd
Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure.
What was argued and what the tribunal found
The appellant's ATM appeal was part of a large group of similar appeals stayed pending the Supreme Court's decision in Cardtronics v Sykes. Following that judgment, the Valuation Officer undertook list maintenance and considered this appeal redundant due to multiple appeals against the same entry. The tribunal dismissed the appeal as the appellant did not appear, was unrepresented, and provided no evidence of an arguable case.
Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was the ratepayer, unrepresented.
Grounds argued
- Validity of the proposal · decisive
- Evidence
- None from the ratepayer
- Cases cited
- Cardtronics UK Ltd and Others v Sykes (VO) and Others
Is your own rateable value in line?
A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.
Check a propertyThe tribunal’s decision in full
Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.