Atm Princes Mead, GU14 6YA
Decided 24 May 2022 27353731 Cluttons
Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure.
What was argued and what the tribunal found
This was one of several hundred ATM-related appeals stayed pending the Supreme Court's Cardtronics judgment. Following the judgment, the tribunal lifted the stay and the Valuation Officer undertook list maintenance. Multiple appeals had been lodged against the same list entries, and after review and discussion, this appeal was considered redundant by the respondent. The appellant did not attend, was not represented, and provided no evidence of an arguable case, leading to dismissal.
Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was the ratepayer.
Grounds argued
- Other
- Evidence
- None from the ratepayer
- Cases cited
- Cardtronics UK Ltd and Others v Sykes (VO) and Others
Is your own rateable value in line?
A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.
Check a propertyThe tribunal’s decision in full
Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.