Tribunals · Royal Borough of Windsor and Maidenhead

Atm Site At 45, Thames Street, SL4 1PR

Decided 24 May 2022 27385948 Clements Agency group

OutcomeDismissed — nobody attended for the ratepayerThe appeal failed and the rateable value was left unchanged.
Original RV—
Ratepayer sought—
VO conceded first—
Tribunal decided—

Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure.

What was argued and what the tribunal found

This was an Automatic Teller Machine related appeal that was stayed pending the Supreme Court's judgment in Cardtronics v Sykes. Following that judgment and a list maintenance exercise by the Valuation Officer, this appeal was considered redundant and dismissed as the appellant did not appear, was not represented, and provided no evidence of an arguable case.

Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was the ratepayer, unrepresented.

Grounds argued

No grounds were argued — the decision records none.

Evidence
None from the ratepayer
Cases cited
Cardtronics UK Ltd and Others v Sykes (VO) and Others [2020] UKSC 21

Similar decisions

All decisions in Royal Borough of Windsor and Maidenhead ·

Is your own rateable value in line?

A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.

Check a property

The tribunal’s decision in full

Download the PDF · Find it on valuationtribunal.gov.uk

Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.