Tribunals · Southampton City Council

Atm Site At 329-333, Shirley Road, SO15 3JD

Decided 24 May 2022 27640622

OutcomeDismissed — nobody attended for the ratepayerThe appeal failed and the rateable value was left unchanged.
Original RV—
Ratepayer sought—
VO conceded first—
Tribunal decided—

Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure.

What was argued and what the tribunal found

The appellant did not appear or provide representation at the tribunal hearing. Following the Supreme Court judgment in Cardtronics v Sykes, a list maintenance exercise was undertaken. The Valuation Officer considered this appeal redundant and asked for dismissal. The tribunal dismissed the appeal as the appellant provided no evidence of an arguable case.

Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was the ratepayer, unrepresented.

Grounds argued

  • Validity of the proposal
Evidence
None from the ratepayer
Cases cited
Cardtronics UK Ltd and Others v Sykes (VO) and Others [2020] UKSC 21

Similar decisions

All decisions in Southampton City Council ·

Is your own rateable value in line?

A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.

Check a property

The tribunal’s decision in full

Download the PDF · Find it on valuationtribunal.gov.uk

Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.