Atm Site At 329-333, Shirley Road, SO15 3JD
Decided 24 May 2022 27640622
Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure.
What was argued and what the tribunal found
The appellant did not appear or provide representation at the tribunal hearing. Following the Supreme Court judgment in Cardtronics v Sykes, a list maintenance exercise was undertaken. The Valuation Officer considered this appeal redundant and asked for dismissal. The tribunal dismissed the appeal as the appellant provided no evidence of an arguable case.
Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was the ratepayer, unrepresented.
Grounds argued
- Validity of the proposal
- Evidence
- None from the ratepayer
- Cases cited
- Cardtronics UK Ltd and Others v Sykes (VO) and Others [2020] UKSC 21
Similar decisions
- Atm Site At The Co-Op, Victoria Road, SO19 9DY — Dismissed, 24 May 2022
- Atm At 52-53, Bedford Place, SO15 2DT — Dismissed, 24 May 2022
- Atm At Gnd Flr 96, Harbour Parade West Quay Road, SO15 1BA — Dismissed, 24 May 2022
- Atm At Gnd Flr 96, Harbour Parade West Quay Road, SO15 1BA — Dismissed, 24 May 2022
Is your own rateable value in line?
A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.
Check a propertyThe tribunal’s decision in full
Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.