Amazon Electronic Delivery Locker Central Services Building, University Of Huddersfield Queensgate, HD1 3DH
Decided 21 March 2023 27768850 Lambert Smith Hampton - Sheffield
Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure.
What was argued and what the tribunal found
The appellant failed to appear at the hearing or provide a statement of case. The Valuation Officer contended there was no case to answer and sought dismissal. The tribunal dismissed the appeal due to the appellant's serious failure to comply with procedural directions and the absence of any substantive argument disputing the rateable value.
Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was the ratepayer, unrepresented.
Grounds argued
No grounds were argued — the decision records none.
- Evidence
- None from the ratepayer
Similar decisions
- Rusty Parts, Birds Edge Lane, HD8 8XR — Allowed in part, 19 Aug 2026
- STAFFORD MILLS, GEORGE STREET, MILNSBRIDGE,, HD3 4JH — Dismissed, 15 Dec 2025
- Rybrook Jaguar Land Rover, Lindley Moor Road, HD3 3TD — Allowed, 17 Sept 2025
- THE OLD SCHOOL, NEW HEY ROAD, OUTLANE, OUTLANE, HD3 3YJ — Dismissed, 18 Jul 2025
Is your own rateable value in line?
A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.
Check a propertyThe tribunal’s decision in full
Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.