Amazon Electronic Delivery Locker Central Services Building, University Of Huddersfield Queensgate, HD1 3DH
Decided 21 March 2023 27768859 Lambert Smith Hampton - Sheffield
Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure.
What was argued and what the tribunal found
The Appellant failed to comply with Tribunal directions to disclose a statement of case and did not attend or represent themselves at the hearing despite proper notice. The Valuation Officer contended there was no case to answer. The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, finding the entry in the 2010 rating list to be correct given the serious procedural breach and absence of substantive argument.
Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was the ratepayer, unrepresented.
Grounds argued
- Validity of the proposal · decisive
- Evidence
- None from the ratepayer
Similar decisions
- Rusty Parts, Birds Edge Lane, HD8 8XR — Allowed in part, 19 Aug 2026
- STAFFORD MILLS, GEORGE STREET, MILNSBRIDGE,, HD3 4JH — Dismissed, 15 Dec 2025
- Rybrook Jaguar Land Rover, Lindley Moor Road, HD3 3TD — Allowed, 17 Sept 2025
- THE OLD SCHOOL, NEW HEY ROAD, OUTLANE, OUTLANE, HD3 3YJ — Dismissed, 18 Jul 2025
Is your own rateable value in line?
A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.
Check a propertyThe tribunal’s decision in full
Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.