Centre For Dentistry At J Sainsbury Plc 44, Church Road, AL8 6SA
Decided 3 March 2023 28699245 Allsop LLP
Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure.
What was argued and what the tribunal found
The Appellant failed to submit a statement of case and did not attend or arrange representation at the hearing despite being properly notified. The Tribunal proceeded in the Appellant's absence and, having found no substantive challenge to the rateable value entry, dismissed the appeal and confirmed the entry in the 2010 non-domestic rating list was correct.
Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was the ratepayer, unrepresented.
Grounds argued
- Validity of the proposal · decisive
- Evidence
- None from the ratepayer
Similar decisions
- 2, THE BOULEVARD, AL7 1EL — Allowed, 3 Aug 2026
- 1, THE BOULEVARD, AL7 1EL — Agreed at hearing, 3 Aug 2026
- GND FLR 1 & 2 SILVER COURT, WATCHMEAD, AL7 1LT — Dismissed, 4 Mar 2026
- 10 Prospect Place, AL6 9EN — Allowed in part, 6 Jan 2026
Is your own rateable value in line?
A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.
Check a propertyThe tribunal’s decision in full
Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.