24-26 Church Street, RM10 9UR
Decided 3 March 2023 28768398
Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure.
What was argued and what the tribunal found
The Appellant failed to submit a statement of case and did not attend or send a representative to the hearing. The Tribunal proceeded in their absence and, finding no substantive argument disputing the rateable value, dismissed the appeal as the entry in the 2010 non-domestic rating list was correct.
Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was the ratepayer, unrepresented.
Grounds argued
No grounds were argued — the decision records none.
- Evidence
- None from the ratepayer
Similar decisions
- Church Elm Motors, Church Elm Lane, RM10 9RR — Allowed, 19 Dec 2025
- Hands on Skills Training Ltd, Gate 17 Royal Albert Basin South, Woolwich Manor Way, Woolwich Manor Way, E16 2NJ — Allowed in part, 29 May 2025
- (INCL R/O PROSPECT PLACE) DAGENHAM MOTORS FLEET HOUSE, RIPPLE ROAD, IG11 9PG — Allowed in part, 9 Jul 2024
- Units 1 & 2 Acorn House, Coppen Road, RM8 1HJ — Allowed in part, 16 May 2024
Is your own rateable value in line?
A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.
Check a propertyThe tribunal’s decision in full
Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.