Atm Site At Tesco, Gravel Hill, SY8 1QU
Decided 24 May 2022 28977342 Johnson Fellows - Rating
Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure.
What was argued and what the tribunal found
The appeal concerned an ATM-related entry that was part of a batch of hundreds of similar appeals stayed pending the Supreme Court's judgment in Cardtronics v Sykes. Following the judgment and list maintenance exercise, the Valuation Officer considered this appeal redundant as multiple appeals had been lodged against the same entry. The appellant did not attend, was not represented, and provided no evidence of an arguable case, resulting in dismissal.
Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was the ratepayer, unrepresented.
Grounds argued
- Other
- Evidence
- None from the ratepayer
- Cases cited
- Cardtronics UK Ltd and Others v Sykes (VO) and Others [2020] UKSC 21
Similar decisions
- Atm At Spa, Salop Street, WV16 5BH — Dismissed, 24 May 2022
Is your own rateable value in line?
A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.
Check a propertyThe tribunal’s decision in full
Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.