Regis Nail Bar At Tesco, The Meadow, GU15 8DX
Decided 3 March 2023 30591505 Allsop LLP
Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure.
What was argued and what the tribunal found
The appellant failed to attend or be represented at the hearing and did not submit a statement of case to the Valuation Officer. The Tribunal Panel proceeded in the appellant's absence and, given the absence of any substantive argument challenging the rateable value, was satisfied that the entry in the 2010 non-domestic rating list was correct and dismissed the appeal.
Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was the ratepayer, unrepresented.
Grounds argued
No grounds were argued — the decision records none.
- Evidence
- None from the ratepayer
Similar decisions
- Atm At 5, Crown Row, RG12 0TH — Dismissed, 24 May 2022
Is your own rateable value in line?
A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.
Check a propertyThe tribunal’s decision in full
Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.