Salon At Tesco Extra, St Marks Road, NN18 8AL
Decided 3 March 2023 30698898 Allsop LLP
Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure.
What was argued and what the tribunal found
The appellant failed to appear at the hearing and did not submit a statement of case to the tribunal. The Valuation Officer argued there was no case to answer. The tribunal dismissed the appeal on procedural grounds due to the appellant's serious failure to comply with directions, without substantive consideration of the rateable value.
Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was the ratepayer, unrepresented.
Grounds argued
No grounds were argued — the decision records none.
- Evidence
- None from the ratepayer
Similar decisions
- Midlands Co-Op Society, Alexandra Road, NN17 1PE — Dismissed, 21 Mar 2023
- 7 Cronin Courtyard, Weldon, NN18 8AG — Dismissed, 15 Apr 2021
Is your own rateable value in line?
A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.
Check a propertyThe tribunal’s decision in full
Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.