8 & 9 Burnt Mill, CM20 2HT
Workshop and premises Decided 8 November 2023 33356932
Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure. This decision covers 2 properties; the figures shown are for the first listed.
What was argued and what the tribunal found
The appellant sought to challenge the rateable value as unreasonable and latterly argued for a split of the subject property into two separate hereditaments. However, the tribunal found it could not determine a split as it was not the ground stated in the original proposal, and the 2010 list had closed, making a new proposal too late. The appeal was dismissed and the property remained in the list with effect from 1 April 2010.
Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was an individual ratepayer, unrepresented.
Grounds argued
- Split or merge the assessment
- Comparable assessments (tone)
- Evidence
- None from the ratepayer
- Cases cited
- Lotus and Delta v Culverwell
- Hearing
- 9 October 2023
Similar decisions
- East Point, Parkway, CM19 5FR — Allowed, 18 Aug 2025
- Poundland Distribution Centre, Elizabeth Way, CM19 5AA — Dismissed, 20 Jun 2025
- Norwood House, Temple Bank, CM20 2DY — Allowed in part, 17 Nov 2023
- PENTAGON TILES DISTRIBUTION LTD, HAROLDS ROAD, CM19 5BJ — Dismissed, 6 Feb 2023
All decisions in Harlow District Council · Industrial and warehouses nationally
Is your own rateable value in line?
A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.
Check a propertyThe tribunal’s decision in full
Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.