Tribunals · Harlow District Council · 2017 rating list

Poundland Distribution Centre, Elizabeth Way, CM19 5AA

Warehouse and premises Decided 20 June 2025 CHG100695343 Colliers International - Erich Andreas Gutt

OutcomeDismissedThe appeal failed, leaving the value at the figure the Valuation Officer had already conceded.
Original RV£2,390,000£55/m²
Ratepayer sought£1,750,000
VO conceded first£2,220,000−7% before the hearing
Tribunal decided£2,220,000£65/m²

Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure.

What was argued and what the tribunal found

The appellant, through its representative, argued that the rateable value of £2,220,000 should be reduced to £1,750,000 (subsequently revised to £1,840,000), contending that a landlord's capital contribution of £5.1m should reduce the effective rent, and that an end allowance of 5% for poor access should apply. The tribunal found that the comparable evidence supported a base rate of £65 per m² for the subject warehouse, that the capital contribution required significant adjustment and little weight should be given to it, and that the lower base rate already reflected the property's inferior Harlow location, rejecting the need for an additional end allowance.

Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was Poundland, represented.

Grounds argued

  • Comparable assessments (tone)
  • Quantum or end allowance
Evidence
Rents, Settled assessments, Expert report
Cases cited
Lotus and Delta v Culverwell
Hearing
23 May 2025

Similar decisions

All decisions in Harlow District Council · Industrial and warehouses nationally

Is your own rateable value in line?

A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.

Check a property

The tribunal’s decision in full

Download the PDF · Find it on valuationtribunal.gov.uk

Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.