Free news & data alerts
Log in
Tribunals · Somerset West and Taunton Council · 2010 rating list

Roborough Gate, Brendon Hill, TA23 0LJ

Stables and premises; Sand school and premises Decided 21 June 2022 33560941

OutcomeDismissedThe appeal failed and the rateable value was left unchanged.
Original RV · 2010 list£1,525
Ratepayer sought—
VO conceded first—
Tribunal decided—from 1 Apr 2010

Figures are as stated in the decision, and are values in the 2010 list; a dash means the document does not state that figure. This judgement decided 2 properties together and does not tie its figures clearly to this appeal, so the figures above are for the first property it lists. Every property is listed below.

The 2 properties in this decision

One judgement covered all of these appeals. Each property’s figures as the judgement states them (2010 list); this appeal’s property is highlighted.

The properties covered by this tribunal decision, with the figures it states for each
PropertyOriginal RVSoughtTribunal decidedOutcome
Roborough Gate, Brendon Hill, Watchet, Somerset, TA23 0LJThis appeal£1,525——Dismissed
Sand School at Brendon Hill, Watchet, Somerset, TA23 0LJ£1,950——Dismissed

What was argued and what the tribunal found

The appellant sought to merge two hereditaments (stables and sand school) that had been entered into the 2010 rating list as separate new assessments from 1 April 2010. The Tribunal found that the proposal was invalid because it was made in June 2019 after the 2010 list had closed, and the PICO Act only permitted such late proposals for properties affected by the Mazars decision (which split contiguous properties into separate hereditaments). Since these properties were entered as new assessments and not as splits resulting from Mazars, the appellant had no right to make a late proposal under the PICO Act framework. The appeal was dismissed.

Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was an individual ratepayer, represented.

Grounds argued

  • Split or merge the assessment
  • Validity of the proposal · decisive
Cases cited
Roberts (VO) v Backhouse Jones Limited [2020] UKUT 0038 (LC); Woolway (VO) v Mazars [2015] UKSC 53; John Laing & Son Ltd v Assessment Committee for Kingswood Assessment Area [1949] 1 KB 344; Libra Textiles Limited T/A Boundary Mills Stores v Roberts (VO) [2020] UKUT 0237 (LC)
Hearing
26 May 2022

Similar decisions

All decisions in Somerset West and Taunton Council ·

Is your own rateable value in line?

A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.

Check a property

The tribunal’s decision in full

Download the PDF · Find it on valuationtribunal.gov.uk

Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.