Free news & data alerts
Log in
Tribunals · Maidstone Borough Council · 2010 rating list

Ardo Offices At Kent Food Park, Smarden Road, Headcorn, Headcorn, Kent, TN27 9TA

Office and premises; Warehouse and premises; Stores and premises Decided 24 March 2021 33922542

OutcomeDismissedThe appeal failed and the rateable value was left unchanged.
Original RV · 2010 list£5,500
Ratepayer sought—
VO conceded first—
Tribunal decided—

Figures are as stated in the decision, and are values in the 2010 list; a dash means the document does not state that figure. This judgement decided 3 properties together; the figures above are for this appeal's property (Unit 9 and stores, adj unit 9 Kent Food Park, Smarden Road, Headcorn, Ashford, Kent TN27 9TA). Every property is listed below.

The 3 properties in this decision

One judgement covered all of these appeals. Each property’s figures as the judgement states them (2010 list); this appeal’s property is highlighted.

The properties covered by this tribunal decision, with the figures it states for each
PropertyOriginal RVSoughtTribunal decidedOutcome
Ardo Offices at Kent Food Park, Smarden Road, Headcorn, Ashford, Kent TN27 9TA£13,500——Dismissed
Unit 9 and stores, adj unit 9 Kent Food Park, Smarden Road, Headcorn, Ashford, Kent TN27 9TAThis appeal£5,500——Dismissed
Chalet at Kent Food Park, Smarden Road, Headcorn, Ashford, Kent TN27 9TA£7,200——Dismissed

What was argued and what the tribunal found

The appellant sought deletion of three hereditaments that had been demolished or removed from site in 2013-2014, arguing they should not have remained in the 2010 rating list until 1 April 2015. The tribunal found the proposal invalid because it was served on 10 January 2019, which was after the statutory time period of 31 March 2017 for making such proposals. Consequently, the tribunal was unable to consider the substantive merits and struck the appeal out on this preliminary issue.

Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was Kent Food Parks Ltd, represented.

Grounds argued

  • Validity of the proposal · decisive
Evidence
None from the ratepayer
Cases cited
Libra Textiles Ltd t/as Boundary Mills and Centric Assets Ltd v Ritchie Roberts and David Alford (Valuation Officers) [2020] UKUT 0237 (LC)
Hearing
25 February 2021

Similar decisions

All decisions in Maidstone Borough Council ·

Is your own rateable value in line?

A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.

Check a property

The tribunal’s decision in full

Download the PDF · Find it on valuationtribunal.gov.uk

Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.