Tribunals · Norwich City Council · 2017 rating list

2A-2F Bridge Court, Fishergate, NR3 1UE

Self-catering accommodation; Aparthotel (building of six apartments) Decided 6 November 2020 CHG100035755

OutcomeDismissedThe appeal failed and the rateable value was left unchanged.
Original RV£15,000
Ratepayer sought£8,601
VO conceded first—
Tribunal decided£15,000from 1 Apr 2017

Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure.

What was argued and what the tribunal found

The appellant, who operated the six-apartment building with hotel-like services (daily cleaning, collection service, mini-bar), argued it should be rated as a hotel and sought a reduction from £15,000 to £8,601. The tribunal found the property was self-catering accommodation, not a hotel, as each apartment was self-contained with its own kitchen and there were no breakfast room, restaurant, or reception areas as would be found in hotels. The tribunal accepted the Valuation Officer's FMT of £128,000 and found that the current RV of £15,000 was not excessive when valued as self-catering accommodation using the agreed 13.5% multiplier.

Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was an individual ratepayer, unrepresented.

Grounds argued

  • Valuation method · decisive
  • Rental evidence
Evidence
Trading accounts, Rents
Hearing
20 October 2020

Similar decisions

All decisions in Norwich City Council · Pubs, hotels and leisure nationally

Is your own rateable value in line?

A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.

Check a property

The tribunal’s decision in full

Download the PDF · Find it on valuationtribunal.gov.uk

Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.