Free news & data alerts
Log in
Tribunals · Norwich City Council · 2017 rating list

Unit 1A, Norwich Railway Station, NR1 1EG

Cafe and premises Decided 5 December 2024 CHG101068479 Tanner Rose

OutcomeDismissedThe appeal failed and the rateable value was left unchanged.
Original RV · 2017 list£77,500
Ratepayer sought£72,500
VO conceded first—
Tribunal decided£77,500from 1 Apr 2017

Figures are as stated in the decision, and are values in the 2017 list; a dash means the document does not state that figure. This judgement decided 4 properties together; the figures above are for this appeal's property (Unit 1A, Norwich Railway Station, Norwich, NR1 1EG). Every property is listed below.

The 4 properties in this decision

One judgement covered all of these appeals. Each property’s figures as the judgement states them (2017 list); this appeal’s property is highlighted.

The properties covered by this tribunal decision, with the figures it states for each
PropertyOriginal RVSoughtTribunal decidedOutcome
Pumpkin Cafe, Station Road, Peterborough, PE1 1QL£95,500£86,000£95,500Dismissed
Pumpkin between Platform 4 and 5, Station Road, Peterborough, PE1 1QL£65,500£60,250£65,500Dismissed
WHSmith, Ticket Hall at Peterborough Station, Peterborough PE1 1QL£64,500£59,000£64,500Dismissed
Unit 1A, Norwich Railway Station, Norwich, NR1 1EGThis appeal£77,500£72,500£77,500Dismissed

What was argued and what the tribunal found

The appellant argued that the MGR (Minimum Guaranteed Rent) elements of railway station retail/café leases represented open market rent, and that turnover top-ups were tenant-specific and should be disregarded. The tribunal found that prospective tenants would factor the top-up element into rental bids, and that actual rents paid around the AVD exceeded the MGR, indicating that the passing rent more accurately reflected statutory rateable value than the MGR alone. The tribunal was not persuaded that the RVs were unreasonable and dismissed the appeals.

Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was Select Service Partner Limited, represented.

Grounds argued

  • Rental evidence
Evidence
Rents
Cases cited
Lotus and Delta v Culverwell
Hearing
11 November 2024

Similar decisions

All decisions in Norwich City Council · Pubs, hotels and leisure nationally

Is your own rateable value in line?

A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.

Check a property

The tribunal’s decision in full

Download the PDF · Find it on valuationtribunal.gov.uk

Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.