Tribunals · City of London Corporation · 2017 rating list

Pt 13th Floor South West, Aviva Building, St Helen's 1, St Helen's 1, EC3A 8EE

Office and premises Decided 12 November 2020 CHG100036326 Savills - London

OutcomeAllowed in partThe tribunal reduced the rateable value, but by less than the ratepayer sought.
Original RV£462,500£500/m²
Ratepayer sought£425
VO conceded first—
Tribunal decided£437,500£435/m²

Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure. This decision covers 3 properties; the figures shown are for the first listed.

What was argued and what the tribunal found

The appellant challenged the rateable values of three office assessments in a prime London financial district building, arguing for £425/m2 based on analysis of comparable rents. The Valuation Officer had reduced the tone from £500/m2 to £460/m2 at challenge stage. The tribunal found that the best evidence came from new lettings rather than renewals, particularly the 4th floor lease, and that the VO's analysis of that lease at £431/m2 provided sound evidence. The tribunal determined that £435/m2 properly reflected the building's prime location and quality, rejecting both the original £500/m2 and the appellant's proposed £425/m2 as respectively too high and too low.

Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was Munich Re UK Services Limited, represented.

Grounds argued

  • Comparable assessments (tone)
  • Rental evidence · decisive
Evidence
Rents, Expert report
Cases cited
Lotus & Delta Ltd v Culverwell
Hearing
19 October 2020

Similar decisions

All decisions in City of London Corporation · Offices nationally

Is your own rateable value in line?

A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.

Check a property

The tribunal’s decision in full

Download the PDF · Find it on valuationtribunal.gov.uk

Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.