Shrewdd Marketing, 27 Harrison Road, HX1 2AF
Office and Premises Decided 16 November 2020 CHG100038402 Gerald Eve LLP - CCA
Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure.
What was argued and what the tribunal found
The appellant argued that internal works to the property (replacement of heating, electrics, asbestos removal and reconfiguration) were repairs/maintenance and did not add value, evidenced by unchanged rent passing and comparable unrefurbished properties. The tribunal found the works were significant refurbishment affecting the ground and first floors (over half the property), and that the VO's distinction between refurbished and unrefurbished areas was reasonable. The appeal succeeded only to the limited extent of accepting the VO's revised valuation of £16,500, rejecting the appellant's proposed £13,250 figure.
Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was Shrewdd Marketing, represented.
Grounds argued
- Building works or disturbance nearby · decisive
- Valuation method
- Rental evidence
- Evidence
- Rents, Expert report, Photographs
- Cases cited
- Gardiner & Theobald LLP v David Jackson (VO)
- Hearing
- 21 October 2020
Is your own rateable value in line?
A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.
Check a propertyThe tribunal’s decision in full
Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.