1-3, Chepstow Road, W2 5BL
Shop and Premises Decided 19 November 2020 CHG100046554 Altus Group - Oakland - Manchester
Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure.
What was argued and what the tribunal found
The appellant, trading as Infusion Haberdashery, challenged the rateable value of a shop on Chepstow Road, London, proposing £52,000 based on a 30% width-to-depth allowance. The tribunal considered comparable rental evidence from similar properties in the locality which supported a zone A rate of £800 per m2, and found that this base rate was not excessive. Although the tribunal acknowledged the shop's individual characteristics (isolated, ageing, underneath residential flats, set back behind pillars), it found no substantive evidence to increase the width-to-depth allowance from the 20% already adopted at the challenge stage, and therefore dismissed the appeal.
Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was an individual ratepayer, represented.
Grounds argued
- Comparable assessments (tone)
- Floor area or measurement
- Quantum or end allowance
- Evidence
- Rents, Settled assessments
- Cases cited
- Lotus and Delta v Culverwell
- Hearing
- 23 October 2020
Similar decisions
- KIOSK (BTW OXFORD CIRCUS STN EAST EXIT & ARGYLL STREET),, Oxford Street, W1D 2LP — Dismissed, 18 May 2026
- Basement And Ground Floor Part, Alhambra House, 23 -33 Charing Cross Road, 23 -33 Charing Cross Road, WC2H 0AU — Allowed in part, 1 Dec 2025
- Basement And Ground Floor Part, Alhambra House, 23 -33 Charing Cross Road, 23 -33 Charing Cross Road, WC2H 0AU — Allowed in part, 1 Dec 2025
- S Franses, 80 Jermyn Street, SW1Y 6JD — Dismissed, 26 Nov 2025
Is your own rateable value in line?
A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.
Check a propertyThe tribunal’s decision in full
Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.