Tribunals · London Borough of Wandsworth · 2017 rating list

CAR PARK, PUTNEY EXCHANGE SHOPPING CENTRE, PUTNEY HIGH STREET, sw15 1tw

Car park and premises Decided 1 February 2021 CHG100056689 Altus Group - Oakland - Manchester

OutcomeDismissedThe appeal failed and the rateable value was left unchanged.
Original RV£229,000
Ratepayer sought—
VO conceded first—
Tribunal decided£229,500

Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure.

What was argued and what the tribunal found

The appellant challenged the rateable value of £229,000 for a 255-space car park at a shopping centre, arguing for a revenues and expenditure method that would yield approximately £450 per space (£114,750 total), based on declining footfall and retail values. The tribunal accepted the Valuation Officer's percentage of Fair Maintainable Trade (FMT) methodology at 40% of £611,000, finding it appropriate for car parks where rental evidence is scarce, with comparable settlements supporting the 40% rate. The appeal was dismissed and the RV of £229,500 was upheld as reasonable.

Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was Blackrock, represented.

Grounds argued

  • Valuation method · decisive
Evidence
Trading accounts, Earlier tribunal decisions
Cases cited
Lotus and Delta v Culverwell; Intu Properties PLC v Dunlevey; K Shoe Shops Ltd v Hardy; Oldschool & Oldschool v Coll; BPP Holdings Ltd v Revenue and Customs Commissioners; Wishart v Hulse; Facciolo v Costantin; Garton v Hunter; Hughes v Exeter City Council; Railway Assessment Authority v Southern Railway Co; Robinson Brothers (Brewers) Ltd v Houghton and Chester-le-Street Assessment Committee; Rozel Motor Co Ltd v Clark; Telereal Trillium v K Hewitt
Hearing
15 January 2021

Is your own rateable value in line?

A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.

Check a property

The tribunal’s decision in full

Download the PDF · Find it on valuationtribunal.gov.uk

Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.