Tribunals · City of London Corporation · 2017 rating list

GND F 11-13 CROSSWALL, EC3N 2LY

Office and Premises Decided 9 March 2021 CHG100066708 Altus Group - Oakland - Manchester

OutcomeDismissedThe appeal failed, leaving the value at the figure the Valuation Officer had already conceded.
Original RV£49,500
Ratepayer sought—
VO conceded first£44,500−10% before the hearing
Tribunal decided£44,500from 1 Oct 2017

Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure.

What was argued and what the tribunal found

The appellant argued that the subject property was negatively affected by a material change of circumstances from the commencement of major demolition and construction works on an adjacent site on 1 October 2017, and that a 17.5% allowance was necessary to reflect the disruption. The Valuation Officer had already reduced the RV by 10%, and the tribunal upheld this allowance as fair and reasonable, finding that the subject property was not as severely affected as the appellant contended (the development site was not confined, an adjacent rather than party wall was affected, and a new lease was taken with no rent reduction despite ongoing works), distinguishing the comparables on which the appellant relied.

Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was HCA International Ltd, represented.

Grounds argued

  • Change of circumstances
Change of circumstances
construction development - demolition and rebuild adjacent site
Evidence
Rents, comparable_properties, Photographs
Hearing
18 February 2021

Similar decisions

All decisions in City of London Corporation · Offices nationally

Is your own rateable value in line?

A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.

Check a property

The tribunal’s decision in full

Download the PDF · Find it on valuationtribunal.gov.uk

Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.