Tribunals · London Borough of Newham · 2017 rating list

COSTA COFFEE AT DLR STATION,, LONDON CITY AIRPORT,, KING GEORGE V DOCK,, KING GEORGE V DOCK,, E16 2PX

Kiosk and premises Decided 22 January 2021 CHG100079824 Altus Group - Oakland - Manchester

OutcomeDismissedThe appeal failed and the rateable value was left unchanged.
Original RV£31,000
Ratepayer sought£25,000
VO conceded first—
Tribunal decided£31,000£420/m²

Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure.

What was argued and what the tribunal found

The appellant argued that the £31,000 RV assessment was excessive and sought a reduction to £25,000 RV based on an unadjusted main space rate of £340/m² derived from the passing rent of £25,000 per annum and comparable properties. The tribunal accepted the Lotus & Delta framework and found that while the subject rent supported the proposed rate, it required caution due to adjustments needed to align with the rating hypothesis (lease commenced in 2010, five years before AVD, and subject to turnover top-up). Examining the basket of comparable rental evidence and the substantial increases in valuations for similar kiosks between the 2010 and 2017 rating lists (from £310/m² to £550-£750/m²), the tribunal was not satisfied that the adopted main space rate of £420/m² was excessive. The appeal was dismissed.

Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was Goldex Investments (Essex) Ltd, represented.

Grounds argued

  • Rental evidence · decisive
  • Comparable assessments (tone)
Evidence
Rents, Settled assessments
Cases cited
Lotus and Delta v Culverwell; Gardiner & Theobald LLP v David Jackson
Hearing
12 January 2021

Is your own rateable value in line?

A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.

Check a property

The tribunal’s decision in full

Download the PDF · Find it on valuationtribunal.gov.uk

Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.