Tribunals · City of Westminster · 2017 rating list

BST & GRD FLR 4,, BLENHEIM STREET,, W1S 1LB

Restaurant and premises Decided 26 March 2021 CHG100085002 Altus Group - Oakland - Manchester

OutcomeAllowed in partThe tribunal reduced the rateable value, but by less than the ratepayer sought.
Original RV£85,000£1450/m²
Ratepayer sought£52,000
VO conceded first£82,500−3% before the hearing
Tribunal decided£71,000£1200/m²

Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure.

What was argued and what the tribunal found

The appellant argued that the zone A rate of £1,400/m² was too high and sought £900/m², relying on rental evidence from comparable properties in Woodstock Street and nearby Blenheim Street. The tribunal found that after applying appropriate adjustments to comparable properties at 1 Woodstock Street and 22 Woodstock Street (allowing 5% and 20% adjustments respectively for location and physical differences), a zone A rate of £1,200/m² was justified, reducing the rateable value from £85,000 to £71,000. The tribunal noted that whilst the latest agreed rent on the appeal property supported a higher valuation, the comparable properties and their adjustments indicated a lower rate was appropriate.

Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was Rising Sun UK, represented.

Grounds argued

  • Comparable assessments (tone)
  • Rental evidence
Evidence
Rents, Photographs
Cases cited
Lotus and Delta v Culverwell
Hearing
9 March 2021

Similar decisions

All decisions in City of Westminster · Pubs, hotels and leisure nationally

Is your own rateable value in line?

A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.

Check a property

The tribunal’s decision in full

Download the PDF · Find it on valuationtribunal.gov.uk

Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.