Tribunals · City of Westminster · 2017 rating list

13 HARBET ROAD, W2 1AJ

Day nursery and premises Decided 28 May 2021 CHG100090445 Altus Group - Oakland - Manchester

OutcomeDismissedThe appeal failed, leaving the value at the figure the Valuation Officer had already conceded.
Original RV£100,000£200/m²
Ratepayer sought£50,500
VO conceded first£67,000−33% before the hearing
Tribunal decided£67,000£200/m²

Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure.

What was argued and what the tribunal found

The appellant sought a reduction in the rateable value from £67,000 (already reduced by the VO from £100,000) to £50,500, arguing for a tone of £152/m² based on the subject property's rent of £60,000 pa. The VO contended that £200/m² was reasonable given the wider basket of comparable rents and settled assessments in the Westminster valuation scheme. The tribunal found that while the subject rent was the starting point, the adopted value of £200/m² was at the lower end of the £300/m² scheme range and was supported by comparable evidence. The appellant failed to produce sufficient evidence to justify the further reduction, so the appeal was dismissed at the VO's reduced assessment of £67,000.

Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was Merchant Square Day Nursery, represented.

Grounds argued

  • Rental evidence
  • Comparable assessments (tone) · decisive
Evidence
Rents, Settled assessments, Photographs
Cases cited
Lotus and Delta v Culverwell
Hearing
14 May 2021

Similar decisions

All decisions in City of Westminster · Pubs, hotels and leisure nationally

Is your own rateable value in line?

A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.

Check a property

The tribunal’s decision in full

Download the PDF · Find it on valuationtribunal.gov.uk

Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.