2ND 3RD PT 4TH & PT 5TH FS, 24 Lombard Street, EC3V 9AJ
Office and Premises Decided 22 March 2021 CHG100095942 CBRE - Elliot Jones
Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure. This decision covers 4 properties; the figures shown are for the first listed.
What was argued and what the tribunal found
The appellant sought a 12.5% reduction in the rateable values of four office properties at 24 Lombard Street, London, claiming a material change in circumstances due to nearby demolition and construction works at 30-32 Lombard Street. The tribunal found that whilst the works had commenced before 1 April 2017, by the material dates (November 2017 to April 2018) the major disruptive works had substantially ceased and the new building's framework was largely complete, meaning no new material change in circumstances had occurred since the list entry date.
Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was Mitsubishi UFJ Trust & Banking Corporation, represented.
Grounds argued
- Change of circumstances · decisive
- Change of circumstances
- construction works
- Evidence
- Photographs, Expert report
- Cases cited
- Gardiner & Theobald LLP v David Jackson (VO)
- Hearing
- 9 March 2021
Similar decisions
- 5 TH FLR 1, BARTHOLOMEW LANE, EC2N 2AX — Dismissed, 10 Sept 2026
- Petronas Energy Trading Ltd, Petronas Energy Trading Ltd, EC4M 7AW — Dismissed, 20 Jul 2026
- Equistone Partners Europe Limited, PT 6TH FLR 60 Ludgate Hill, EC4M 7AW — Dismissed, 20 Jul 2026
- Ropes & Gray International Llp, 5th Floor South, EC4M 7AW — Dismissed, 20 Jul 2026
All decisions in City of London Corporation · Offices nationally
Is your own rateable value in line?
A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.
Check a propertyThe tribunal’s decision in full
Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.