Sirius Minerals Plc, Resolution House, YO11 3ZB
Offices and premises Decided 24 November 2020 CHG100101635 Lambert Smith Hampton - Philip Clarkson
Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure.
What was argued and what the tribunal found
The appellant company, represented by a surveyor, argued that the rateable value of £292,500 (latterly £272,500 after VOA concession) was not reasonable and sought £210,000 based on comparable properties showing a lower tone. The tribunal found the comparable properties provided were not 'like for like' comparisons as they were smaller industrial units rather than a prestige headquarters building. The tribunal was persuaded that the nearly £2 million refurbishment investment and some tenant interest (despite the six-year void period) indicated demand for the property, and dismissed the appeal, accepting the VOA's conceded figure of £272,500.
Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was York Potash Ltd, represented.
Grounds argued
- Comparable assessments (tone)
- Quantum or end allowance
- Evidence
- Rents, Photographs, Expert report
- Cases cited
- Lotus and Delta v Culverwell; Gardiner & Theobald LLP v David Jackson
- Hearing
- 13 November 2020
Is your own rateable value in line?
A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.
Check a propertyThe tribunal’s decision in full
Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.