Tribunals · Uttlesford District Council · 2017 rating list

19 OAK INDUSTRIAL PARK, DUNMOW, CM6 1XN

Car showroom and premises Decided 23 June 2021 CHG100127578 Altus Group - Oakland - Manchester

OutcomeDismissedThe appeal failed and the rateable value was left unchanged.
Original RV£102,000£150/m²
Ratepayer sought£49,250
VO conceded first—
Tribunal decided£102,000£150/m²

Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure.

What was argued and what the tribunal found

The appellant, trading as an agricultural and ground-care dealer, argued the property should be valued as industrial at £49,250 RV rather than as a car showroom at £102,000 RV, citing a change in use and reliance on two comparable industrial properties. The tribunal found the property was correctly valued as a car showroom and premises because its physical characteristics, prominent main road location, purpose-built design, high showroom content, and planning permission designation indicated continued showroom use despite the change from new car sales to agricultural machinery, making it rebus sic stantibus a showroom and premises rather than an industrial unit.

Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was George Browns Limited, represented.

Grounds argued

  • Comparable assessments (tone)
  • Valuation method
Evidence
Settled assessments, Earlier tribunal decisions, Photographs, Expert report
Cases cited
Scottish & Newcastle Retail Limited & Allied Domecq Retailing Limited v R F Williams (VO); Scottish & Newcastle v Williams (VO) RA-480-1993 (LT); Gardiner & Theobald LLP v David Jackson (VO) [2018] UKUT 0253 (LC)
Hearing
11 June 2021

Is your own rateable value in line?

A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.

Check a property

The tribunal’s decision in full

Download the PDF · Find it on valuationtribunal.gov.uk

Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.