Inghams Solicitors, 37 Red Bank Road, FY2 9HX
Office Decided 14 October 2021 CHG100130002 Ken Batty Chartered Surveyors
Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure.
What was argued and what the tribunal found
The appellant contended that end allowances should be applied for poor layout characteristics, including a pillar obstructing zone B, step up from pavement, poor natural light, beam restrictions, and circulation difficulties, citing comparable treatment of nearby properties. The tribunal found the layout and characteristics were not unique but not comparable to the 5% allowance given to a double unit at 15 Red Bank Road. The tribunal awarded a 2.5% end allowance, reducing the RV from £10,000 to £9,750, as the appellant proved sufficient evidence to justify a reduction for the pillar positioning and layout difficulties affecting occupation.
Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was Inghams Solicitors, represented.
Grounds argued
- Zoning or layout
- Quantum or end allowance · decisive
- Evidence
- Photographs, Expert report
- Hearing
- 22 September 2021
Is your own rateable value in line?
A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.
Check a propertyThe tribunal’s decision in full
Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.