Nisa Local, Unit 2, WA5 0FF
Shop and premises Decided 4 November 2021 CHG100140917 Peter E Gilkes & Co - Ben Gilkes
Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure.
What was argued and what the tribunal found
The appellant, a convenience store operator, challenged the rateable value of their newly-relocated store at £20,250 RV (reduced from £29,250), arguing it should be valued on a zoned basis at a much lower figure of £5,950 RV, citing concerns about the locality's deprivation levels and the comparability of properties used by the Valuation Officer. The tribunal found the overall valuation method to be reasonable but concluded the comparable properties were located in more affluent areas and therefore adjusted the price per m2 from £90 to £65, resulting in a revised RV of £15,000.
Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was Dallam Stores, represented.
Grounds argued
- Comparable assessments (tone) · decisive
- Zoning or layout
- Rental evidence
- Evidence
- Rents, Settled assessments, Photographs
- Cases cited
- Lotus and Delta v Culverwell; Gardiner and Theobald LLP v David Jackson
- Hearing
- 20 October 2021
Is your own rateable value in line?
A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.
Check a propertyThe tribunal’s decision in full
Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.