Unit 7600-7650, Daresbury Park, Daresbury, Daresbury, WA4 4BS
Offices and premises Decided 9 July 2021 CHG100162288 Roberts Vain Wilshaw - Paul Roberts
Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure.
What was argued and what the tribunal found
The appellant argued that the rateable value of £101,000 was excessive, based on analysis of the rent adjusted for a £490,000 reverse premium, suggesting a value of £77,000 (£80/m2). The tribunal found the appellant's analysed rent of £70,441 was too low when compared with comparable units (6600 and 6300) which had rents of £119,680 and £106,225 respectively despite being only two-thirds the size. The tribunal concluded the rateable value of £101,000 was not unreasonable compared with these comparables and dismissed the appeal.
Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was Sentinel Performance Solutions, represented.
Grounds argued
- Rental evidence
- Comparable assessments (tone)
- Evidence
- Rents, Expert report, Photographs, measurements_survey
- Cases cited
- Lotus and Delta v Culverwell; K Shoe Shops v Hardy
- Hearing
- 11 June 2021
Is your own rateable value in line?
A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.
Check a propertyThe tribunal’s decision in full
Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.