Flank wall, 60 Eden street, Kingston Upon Thames, Kingston Upon Thames, KT1 1EE
Advertising Right and Premises Decided 23 December 2022 CHG100189728 Whitestone Commercial - Chris Lambert
Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure.
What was argued and what the tribunal found
The appellant, represented by Whitestone Commercial Ltd, argued the RV should be reduced to £8,750 based on the subject rent of £8,750 per annum and comparable properties showing lower values. The Valuation Officer maintained that £20,000 RV was fair, reflecting the digital nature of the hoarding and its prominent location on a major shopping street. The tribunal dismissed the appeal, finding that while the actual rent was the starting point, the rent requiring substantial adjustments to the rating hypothesis was given little weight, and comparable properties in superior locations (particularly 790 High Road, N12 9QR at £23,000 RV) supported the current assessment of £20,000.
Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was Spires Sports Ltd, represented.
Grounds argued
- Rental evidence
- Comparable assessments (tone)
- Evidence
- Rents, Settled assessments
- Cases cited
- Lotus & Delta Ltd v Culverwell
- Hearing
- 25 November 2022
Is your own rateable value in line?
A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.
Check a propertyThe tribunal’s decision in full
Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.