5th Flr Barnards Inn 86 Fetter Lane, EC4A 1EQ
Office and premises Decided 7 August 2023 CHG100195687 CBRE - Vincent Newbury
Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure.
What was argued and what the tribunal found
The appellant challenged the rateable value as unreasonable, arguing for a basic price of £350/m² (rather than the VO's £387.50/m²) and an end allowance of 15% (rather than the VO's 10%) due to extensive construction work at an adjacent property causing noise, vibration, and loss of amenity. The tribunal found that comparable rental evidence from lettings in the same building supported the lower tone of £350/m², and that the external construction work lasting approximately three years after the antecedent valuation date justified the higher 15% end allowance rather than 10%. The appeal was allowed, reducing the RV to £273,500.
Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was Veale Wasbrough Vizards LLP, represented.
Grounds argued
- Comparable assessments (tone) · decisive
- Building works or disturbance nearby
- Change of circumstances
- construction disturbance
- Evidence
- Rents, Settled assessments, Photographs
- Cases cited
- Lotus and Delta v Culverwell
- Hearing
- 28 July 2023
Similar decisions
- 5 TH FLR 1, BARTHOLOMEW LANE, EC2N 2AX — Dismissed, 10 Sept 2026
- Petronas Energy Trading Ltd, Petronas Energy Trading Ltd, EC4M 7AW — Dismissed, 20 Jul 2026
- Equistone Partners Europe Limited, PT 6TH FLR 60 Ludgate Hill, EC4M 7AW — Dismissed, 20 Jul 2026
- Ropes & Gray International Llp, 5th Floor South, EC4M 7AW — Dismissed, 20 Jul 2026
All decisions in City of London Corporation · Offices nationally
Is your own rateable value in line?
A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.
Check a propertyThe tribunal’s decision in full
Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.