Tribunals · City of Westminster · 2017 rating list

Bst & Grd Flr, 8-10 Great Titchfield Street, W1W 8BB

Showroom and premises Decided 10 February 2022 CHG100199664 Michael Charles Hampton-Riddington/Cluttons - Michael Charles Hampton Riddington

OutcomeDismissedThe appeal failed, leaving the value at the figure the Valuation Officer had already conceded.
Original RV£213,000£750/m²
Ratepayer sought£142,000
VO conceded first£177,000−17% before the hearing
Tribunal decided£177,000£750/m²

Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure.

What was argued and what the tribunal found

The appellant argued that the rateable value of £213,000 should be reduced to £142,000, contending that the passing rent of £140,000 pa (£597.55/m²) was the best evidence and supported a main space rate of £600/m² rather than the assessed £750/m². The tribunal applied the Lotus and Delta principles and found that while the actual rent was the correct starting point, the comparable properties and settled agreements on Great Titchfield Street and surrounding areas supported the reduced rate of £750/m² as reasonable and not excessive, particularly given the property's prominent location closer to Oxford Circus. The appeal was dismissed and the rateable value confirmed at £177,000.

Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was Johnson Tiles, represented.

Grounds argued

  • Rental evidence
  • Comparable assessments (tone) · decisive
Evidence
Rents, Settled assessments
Cases cited
Lotus and Delta v Culverwell
Hearing
25 January 2022

Similar decisions

All decisions in City of Westminster · Shops nationally

Is your own rateable value in line?

A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.

Check a property

The tribunal’s decision in full

Download the PDF · Find it on valuationtribunal.gov.uk

Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.