Tribunals · West Berkshire Council · 2017 rating list

Marshall Newbury Jaguar Land Rover, 77 Greenham Business Park, RG19 6HW

Car Showroom and premises Decided 8 September 2021 CHG100287895 Rapleys LLP - Alan Watson

OutcomeDismissedThe appeal failed, leaving the value at the figure the Valuation Officer had already conceded.
Original RV£560,000£180/m²
Ratepayer sought£479,000
VO conceded first£505,000−10% before the hearing
Tribunal decided£505,000£180/m²

Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure.

What was argued and what the tribunal found

The appellant argued that a newly built Jaguar Land Rover showroom should be valued at £170/m2 (RV £479,000) on the basis that the location was disadvantageous and that the property should be valued as a generic showroom capable of use by any manufacturer, citing the rebus sic stantibus principle. The tribunal found that the property's status as a modern state-of-the-art showroom for a high-end manufacturer justified the £180/m2 valuation, noting that conversion costs between such marques would exceed £250-400/m2, and that comparable newer showrooms were valued at £180/m2 or higher. The tribunal dismissed the appeal, accepting the Valuation Officer's £505,000 value.

Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was Marshall Motor Group, represented.

Grounds argued

  • Comparable assessments (tone) · decisive
  • Valuation method
Evidence
Settled assessments, Photographs, Expert report
Cases cited
Lotus and Delta v Culverwell; Ladies Hosiery v West Middlesex Assessment Committee; Williams v Scottish & Newcastle Retail Ltd and Allied Domecq Retailing Ltd
Hearing
16 August 2021

Is your own rateable value in line?

A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.

Check a property

The tribunal’s decision in full

Download the PDF · Find it on valuationtribunal.gov.uk

Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.