Tribunals · Tewkesbury Borough Council · 2017 rating list

Porsche Centre Tewkesbury, Shannon Way, GL20 8ND

Car Showroom and Premises Decided 20 July 2022 CHG100321484 Jones Lang LaSalle - Andrew Flower

OutcomeAllowed in partThe tribunal reduced the rateable value, but by less than the ratepayer sought.
Original RV£340,000£185/m²
Ratepayer sought£275,500
VO conceded first—
Tribunal decided£277,500£150/m²

Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure.

What was argued and what the tribunal found

The appellant challenged the rateable value on the grounds that the price per m² of £185 was excessive and inconsistent with comparable car showrooms in the area which were valued at £150 per m². The appellant relied on comparable assessments showing that the appeal property was valued at the highest level of all car showrooms in the Gloucester area, whereas the 2010 list had been valued consistently with others at £120 per m². The tribunal found that whilst a lease rent of £365,000 per annum existed, it should be treated with caution as a connected party transaction. The tribunal attached most weight to the comparable assessments and determined that at £185 per m² the valuation was unreasonable and inconsistent, reducing the value to £150 per m² (£277,500 RV including plant and machinery allowance).

Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was Dick Lovett (Specialist Cars) Ltd, represented.

Grounds argued

  • Comparable assessments (tone) · decisive
  • Rental evidence
Evidence
Rents, Settled assessments
Cases cited
Lotus and Delta v Culverwell; Gardiner & Theobald LLP v David Jackson
Hearing
6 July 2022

Is your own rateable value in line?

A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.

Check a property

The tribunal’s decision in full

Download the PDF · Find it on valuationtribunal.gov.uk

Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.