RM 504 5TH FLR, 80 Coleman Street, EC2R 5BJ
Offices and premises Decided 29 July 2025 CHG100348138 Avison Young (UK) Ltd
Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure. This decision covers 146 properties; the figures shown are for the first listed.
What was argued and what the tribunal found
The appellant (Beaumont Business Centres Ltd) challenged 146 assessments for serviced office suites within the building on various grounds including material change of circumstances arising from building works. The parties reached agreement that the main tone should be reduced from £395/m² to £380/m², with a 4% allowance for building works disturbance effective 1 April 2017 and an additional 4% (8% total) for the period 14 August 2017 to 14 October 2020. The tribunal ratified the agreed valuations, which reflected both the reduction in tone and the time-limited allowances for the impact of the adjacent building works during the specified periods.
Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was Beaumont Business Centres Ltd, represented.
Grounds argued
- Change of circumstances
- Building works or disturbance nearby · decisive
- Change of circumstances
- building works
- Hearing
- 17 July 2025
Similar decisions
- 5 TH FLR 1, BARTHOLOMEW LANE, EC2N 2AX — Dismissed, 10 Sept 2026
- Petronas Energy Trading Ltd, Petronas Energy Trading Ltd, EC4M 7AW — Dismissed, 20 Jul 2026
- Equistone Partners Europe Limited, PT 6TH FLR 60 Ludgate Hill, EC4M 7AW — Dismissed, 20 Jul 2026
- Ropes & Gray International Llp, 5th Floor South, EC4M 7AW — Dismissed, 20 Jul 2026
All decisions in City of London Corporation · Offices nationally
Is your own rateable value in line?
A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.
Check a propertyThe tribunal’s decision in full
Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.