Tribunals · City of London Corporation · 2017 rating list

RM 4.09 4TH FLR, 80 Coleman Street, EC2R 5BJ

Offices and premises; serviced offices Decided 29 July 2025 CHG100348318 Avison Young (UK) Ltd

OutcomeAllowed in partThe tribunal reduced the rateable value, but by less than the ratepayer sought.
Original RV£28,750£395/m²
Ratepayer sought£27,000
VO conceded first—
Tribunal decided£27,000£380/m²

Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure. This decision covers 146 properties; the figures shown are for the first listed.

What was argued and what the tribunal found

The appellant challenged the rateable values of 146 serviced office units, arguing that the tone of the list should be reduced from £395 per m² to £380 per m² and that material change of circumstance allowances should apply for building works disturbance on 1 April 2017 and 14 August 2017. The parties reached agreement before the hearing on all issues: the tribunal ratified the agreed values, which applied a main rate reduction to £380 per m² with a 4% allowance for building works from 1 April 2017 and an additional 4% allowance for the period 14 August 2017 to 14 October 2020.

Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was Beaumont Business Centres Ltd, represented.

Grounds argued

  • Comparable assessments (tone)
  • Change of circumstances
  • Building works or disturbance nearby
Change of circumstances
building works disturbance
Evidence
tone_of_list_comparables
Hearing
17 July 2025

Similar decisions

All decisions in City of London Corporation · Offices nationally

Is your own rateable value in line?

A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.

Check a property

The tribunal’s decision in full

Download the PDF · Find it on valuationtribunal.gov.uk

Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.