RM 3.08 3RD FLR, 80 Coleman Street, EC2R 5BJ
Offices and premises Decided 29 July 2025 CHG100352464 Avison Young (UK) Ltd
Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure. This decision covers 146 properties; the figures shown are for the first listed.
What was argued and what the tribunal found
Appellant challenged 146 serviced office assessments at 80 Coleman Street on grounds of material change of circumstance due to building works and other grounds. The parties had agreed valuations prior to hearing based on a revised main rate of £380 per m² (reduced from £395 per m²) with 4% allowance for MCC disturbance effective 1 April 2017, and an additional 4% allowance for MCC disturbance effective 14 August 2017 until 15 October 2020. The Tribunal ratified the agreed values, declining to order a post-works value as it found Regulation 38(7) only permitted finite period reductions reflecting the duration of the circumstances.
Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was Beaumont Business Centres Ltd, represented.
Grounds argued
- Change of circumstances · decisive
- Building works or disturbance nearby
- Change of circumstances
- building works
- Hearing
- 17 July 2025
Similar decisions
- 5 TH FLR 1, BARTHOLOMEW LANE, EC2N 2AX — Dismissed, 10 Sept 2026
- Petronas Energy Trading Ltd, Petronas Energy Trading Ltd, EC4M 7AW — Dismissed, 20 Jul 2026
- Equistone Partners Europe Limited, PT 6TH FLR 60 Ludgate Hill, EC4M 7AW — Dismissed, 20 Jul 2026
- Ropes & Gray International Llp, 5th Floor South, EC4M 7AW — Dismissed, 20 Jul 2026
All decisions in City of London Corporation · Offices nationally
Is your own rateable value in line?
A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.
Check a propertyThe tribunal’s decision in full
Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.