Tribunals · North Devon District Council · 2017 rating list

Offices, North Walk, EX31 1EA

Offices and premises Decided 8 June 2026 CHG100386363 NPS Group - Thomas Hancock

OutcomeAllowed in partThe tribunal reduced the rateable value, but by less than the ratepayer sought.
Original RV£347,500
Ratepayer sought£1
VO conceded first£77,500−78% before the hearing
Tribunal decided£56,500from 1 Apr 2017

Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure.

What was argued and what the tribunal found

The appellant (Devon County Council) argued the property should be valued at £1 as there is no demand for a single occupier of this large, dated nine-storey office building. The tribunal accepted there is no demand for occupation as a whole but found evidence of demand for office accommodation in the locality at a smaller scale. While rejecting the nomination value of £1, the tribunal found the Valuation Officer's 45% allowance insufficient to reflect the building's exceptional disadvantages including size, age, condition, and operational costs. The tribunal allowed the appeal in part, increasing the allowance to 60% to reduce the rateable value from £77,500 to £56,500.

Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was Devon County Council, represented.

Grounds argued

  • Valuation method
  • Change of circumstances
Change of circumstances
refurbishment of adjacent building and demolition of connecting link
Evidence
Settled assessments, Measurement survey
Cases cited
Telereal Trillium Ltd v Hewitt [2019] UKSC 23; Sheil v Borg-Warner Ltd [1984] 2 EGLR 211
Hearing
11 May 2026

Is your own rateable value in line?

A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.

Check a property

The tribunal’s decision in full

Download the PDF · Find it on valuationtribunal.gov.uk

Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.