Free news & data alerts
Log in
Tribunals · Liverpool City Council · 2017 rating list

Mando Group Part 4th Floor 5 St Pauls Square, L3 9SJ

Offices and premises Decided 6 September 2024 CHG100396080 CBRE

OutcomeAllowedThe tribunal reduced the rateable value.
Original RV · 2017 list£74,000
Ratepayer sought£33,000
VO conceded first£71,000−4% before the hearing
Tribunal decided£44,000from 1 Apr 2017

Figures are as stated in the decision, and are values in the 2017 list; a dash means the document does not state that figure. This judgement decided 2 properties together; the figures above are for this appeal's property (Part 4th Floor 5 St Pauls Square, Liverpool L3 9SJ). Every property is listed below.

The 2 properties in this decision

One judgement covered all of these appeals. Each property’s figures as the judgement states them (2017 list); this appeal’s property is highlighted.

The properties covered by this tribunal decision, with the figures it states for each
PropertyOriginal RVSoughtTribunal decidedOutcome
Pt 5th (East) & 6th Flrs XYZ Building, 2, Hardman Boulevard, Manchester M3 3AQ£640,000£510,000£595,000Allowed
Part 4th Floor 5 St Pauls Square, Liverpool L3 9SJThis appeal£74,000£33,000£44,000Allowed

What was argued and what the tribunal found

Shoosmiths LLP challenged the Valuation Officer's assessment of the 5th and 6th floors of XYZ Building in Manchester, arguing the RV of £640,000 (£225 per m²) was not reasonable based on a rental analysis at £179 per m² (£510,000). The tribunal found the Valuation Officer's approach to valuation of the Category B fit-out was flawed, as it amortized tenant fit-out costs to create an uplift without reliable market evidence. The tribunal adopted a Category A analysed rent of £195 per m² and applied a £15 per m² uplift for Category B fit-out to arrive at £210 per m², resulting in an RV of £595,000.

Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was Shoosmiths LLP, represented.

Grounds argued

  • Rental evidence
  • Comparable assessments (tone)
  • Valuation method
Evidence
Rents, Expert report
Cases cited
Bunyan (VO) v Acenden Limited [2023] UKUT 17 (LC); Gardiner & Theobald LLP v David Jackson (VO) [2018] UKUT 0253 (LC); Porter (VO) v Trustees of Gladman SIPPS [2011] RA 33
Hearing
22 July 2024

Is your own rateable value in line?

A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.

Check a property

The tribunal’s decision in full

Download the PDF · Find it on valuationtribunal.gov.uk

Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.